Univision News

Visit our sister website: UnivisionNoticias.com

The New York Times may bar its writers from using the term “illegals”

 
The world’s most influential newspaper may be adding the term “illegals” to its list of words not to use. (Flickr: orangeblob)

By JUAN GASTELUM
Channel: Immigration, Media 

Motivated by reader responses to a column by former executive editor Bill Keller, it seems The New York Times may soon be updating its style book to caution writers against using the term “illegals” to describe individuals who are in the United States illegally.

Keller wrote in his blog on Tuesday that he consulted Phil B. Corbett, the newspaper’s standards editor, for guidance on how to answer the numerous objections he received for using the term freely in his column. Corbett replied that he believes the term, used routinely by anti-immigration groups, has “an unnecessarily pejorative tone” and that “it’s wise to steer clear.”

“It might be worth cautioning against ‘illegals’ in the style book entry, though if I do that, I will wait for a decent interval – otherwise some suspicious observer will assume the change is aimed at you,” Corbett continued.

In his column, Keller spelled out some of the issues surrounding the national debate on immigration. He also praised Newt Gingrich, the current front-runner in the race for the Republican presidential nomination who recently proposed changes to the country’s immigration system, for introducing substance to a conversation that had been marked by attacks and an unwillingness to talk about anything beyond securing the border.

Some readers were offended by his use of “illegal” as a noun rather than an adjective, or at least found it distracting.

“Shortening ‘illegal immigrants’ to ‘illegals’ reduces human beings to a status label, and a morally loaded one at that,” one reader wrote.

“This is a made-up word with an agenda, which is why I had a difficult time reading your otherwise informative piece,” wrote another.

Keller mentions that he did not consider using the term as shorthand more reductive than using “illegal immigrants,” which he thinks is accurate and is the publication’s preferred term. He does agree that it is bad practice to use terminology that distracts readers from an article’s substance and says that he will “resist that particular shorthand in the future.”

The newspaper’s style book currently asks writers not to use “illegal alien” or “undocumented.” Whether “illegals” will be added to that list remains to be seen.

  1. jejuneraccoon reblogged this from stfuxenobigotry and added:
    APENAS. The Gray Lady is really behind many other newspapers in this respect. Check your AP Stylebook.
  2. fleurrex reblogged this from univisionnews
  3. immigrantstories reblogged this from univisionnews
  4. afroxander reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    See also: http://colorlines.com/droptheiword/
  5. nanablog reblogged this from univisionnews
  6. yulisalinas reblogged this from univisionnews
  7. inchwormalways reblogged this from univisionnews and added:
    YES YES YES YES YES. Thank you. Stop
  8. gotwaterbuffalo reblogged this from univisionnews
  9. hooah reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    lauded by reasonable people as a responsible use of language, derided by idiots as an attack by the “PC police”
  10. This was featured in #Long Reads
  11. planetsedge reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    Obscene that writers trained to keep bias in check are having this suggested by a style guide.
  12. sjriley reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  13. deadliestsnatch reblogged this from univisionnews
  14. rigo-padilla reblogged this from univisionnews
  15. thenoobyorker reblogged this from univisionnews
  16. bebe-gunn reblogged this from batacinide
  17. mercedesred reblogged this from stfuxenobigotry
  18. cynique reblogged this from stfuxenobigotry
  19. stfuxenobigotry reblogged this from univisionnews and added:
    FINALLY.